It’s a matter of right and wrong.
WHY TEAPARTY? It’s a matter of right and wrong.
It’s way beyond parties and politically correct outcomes.
Hi, my name is John Powser. I am the Independent representative to this grass roots effort. I am concerned for individual freedom, free markets, and the constitution.
If I am fortunate enough for anyone to read this, I would appreciate both brutal and friendly feedback. Before I go into detail pursuing this vector, I need to know if anyone else gives a hoot.
I would like to deal with a subject that is so large that is both exciting and intimidating.
I want to explore the currently dominant philosophy of moral relativism and why it leads to immoral and irrational government action. (It depends on what the definition of is is.) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/
The opposite of moral relativism is moral objectivism. Objectivism holds that there is an objective, tangible reality that exists independent of our feelings and perceptions. Our reasoning mind is the means of understanding and dealing with reality. If a society is to grow and prosper, there must be objective codes of conduct to assure predictable and effective interaction.
The founding fathers based the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution on this. They understood, on an unprecedented level, that freedom of individual action would create a hyper dynamic of growth and prosperity.
Life - Liberty – Pursuit of Happiness, these should protected by government, not constrained by government. Government’s role is to protect the codes of behavior and the laws of interaction that allow individuals to strive and succeed without violating the rights of their fellow citizens.
This seems so obvious to us. How could we have strayed so far from the intent of the Founders? My premise is that moral relativism is at the root of this evil. If all codes are relative, then any code is valid – it depends! Progressives see the Constitution as an inconvenient constraint that gets in the way of their preferred outcomes.
If enough of you are interested, we can explore why a lack of moral objectivism leads to the irrational and immoral government that we have today.
We can explore and explain irrational actions such as:
Spending on government at levels that will certainly bankrupt the country,
Taking the output of producers and giving it to moochers,
Devolving our sovereignty through open borders,
Having given up control of huge portions of our markets and our liberties to government,
Etc, Etc.
It’s not a matter of Party, It’s a matter of Principle.
Let me know what you think.
John Powser
4-30-09